Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m a little confused.
When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of the Apache team? Thanks > On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis. > > Robbie > > On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: >> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is >> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf >> mirror. >> >> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of >> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org >> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror, >> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does >> too. >> >> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the >> mirrors again, I'll ask and see. >> >> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> too late :) >>> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to >>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe. >>>> >>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus >>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to >>>> happen *right now* :) >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go >>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has >>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever >>>>>> recreate the mirror. >>>>>> >>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an >>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and >>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain >>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old >>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates >>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or >>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish >>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA >>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key). >>>>>> >>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub >>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so >>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again. >>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done >>>>>> now than later. >>>>>> >>>>>> Robbie >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at: >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from >>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that >>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would >>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on >>>>>>> github. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these >>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been >>>>>>> hearing the PR comments). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
