Thanks!
> On May 22, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Infra (short for infra-structure) is a team at apache that handles
> things like JIRA, git integration... etc
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Mark Frazier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m
>> a little confused.
>>
>> When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of
>> the Apache team?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis.
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is
>>>> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf
>>>> mirror.
>>>>
>>>> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of
>>>> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org
>>>> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror,
>>>> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the
>>>> mirrors again, I'll ask and see.
>>>>
>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> too late :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to
>>>>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
>>>>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
>>>>>> happen *right now* :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go
>>>>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has
>>>>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever
>>>>>>>> recreate the mirror.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an
>>>>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and
>>>>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain
>>>>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old
>>>>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates
>>>>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or
>>>>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>>>>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA
>>>>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub
>>>>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so
>>>>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again.
>>>>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done
>>>>>>>> now than later.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from
>>>>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that
>>>>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would
>>>>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on
>>>>>>>>> github.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these
>>>>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been
>>>>>>>>> hearing the PR comments).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected]
>>>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected]
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected]
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
