dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Kiruban Kamaraj
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] multiple choice voting procedure Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Amogh Desai
  • [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Python Client 3.1.0 from 3.1.0rc1 Kaxil Naik
• [ANNOUNCE]: Go SDK 1.0.0 beta1 now available for feedback and testing Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Go SDK 1.0.0 beta1 now available for feedback and testing Aritra Basu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Go SDK 1.0.0 beta1 now available for feedback and testing Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 22, 2025 Buğra Öztürk
• [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Dheeraj Turaga
  • [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Airflow 3.1.1 from 3.1.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.1.1 from 1.1.1rc1 Kaxil Naik
• [Contribution Opportunity] Migrate remaining providers to `common.compat` compatibility layer Kaxil Naik
• [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 23rd October - agenda Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 23rd October - agenda Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 23rd October - agenda Vikram Koka via dev
• [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Approach for bumping version of dependent providers Jarek Potiuk
• Bug report Khasim Shaik
  • Re: Bug report Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Vincent Beck
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kataria, Ramit
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tamara Fingerlin via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Collin McNulty
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ryan Hatter via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Sumit Maheshwari
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Josh Fell via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bas Harenslak via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Brent Bovenzi via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Ryan Hatter via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kiruban Kamaraj
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bowrna Prabhakaran
  • Re: [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Bhavani Ravi
• [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jorrick Sleijster
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Using PGBouncer vs, SQL Alchemy pooling in Airflow 3 ? Jarek Potiuk
• Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Airflow 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 Vikram Koka via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] Breeze auto-upgrade mechanism and uv.lock Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Breeze auto-upgrade mechanism and uv.lock Amogh Desai
• Adding Japanese translation Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Kengo Seki
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Brent Bovenzi via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Wei Lee
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Amogh Desai
  • Re: Adding Japanese translation Shahar Epstein
  • RE: Re: Adding Japanese translation Sanda
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Kengo Seki
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: Adding Japanese translation Amogh Desai
• [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Bolke de Bruin
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-89: Privacy-First Telemetry for Apache Airflow Jarek Potiuk
• [FEEDBACK] Airflow Summit Telemetry Survey Results Bolke de Bruin
• Upcoming Airflow 2.11.1 release [was: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2] Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Josef Šimánek
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Vincent Beck
  • Re: [VOTE] dag vs DAG vs Dag Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of September 18, 2025 Elad Kalif
• Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Dev iL
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Amogh Desai
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Mypy prek hooks moved to `pre-push` stage - QOL improvement Pavankumar Gopidesu
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of October 01, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [ANNOUNCE] 1 Month Left to Complete the 2025 Airflow Survey Briana Steel via dev
• [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Constance Martineau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag") Jarek Potiuk
• SQLAlchemy 2 migration Beck, Vincent
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Amogh Desai
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Vincent Beck
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Vincent Beck
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Amogh Desai
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: SQLAlchemy 2 migration Buğra Öztürk
• [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Hussein Awala
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [ACCELERATED VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2025 Amogh Desai
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on October 01, 2025 are released Elad Kalif
• Inquiry Regarding Support, Billing, and Licensing for Apache Kafka & Airflow Docker Deployments da1 Dfcs
  • Re: Inquiry Regarding Support, Billing, and Licensing for Apache Kafka & Airflow Docker Deployments Jarek Potiuk
• CVE-2025-54831: Apache Airflow: Connection sensitive details exposed to users with READ permissions Kaxil Naik
• Adding Thai UI translation Kan Ouivirach
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Adding Thai UI translation Pierre Jeambrun
• Re: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2 (Connexion 2.15.0rc1) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2 (Connexion 2.15.0rc1) Vincent Beck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2 (Connexion 2.15.0rc1) Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2 (Connexion 2.15.0rc1) Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Possible Werkzeug vulnerabilities fix for Airflow 2 (Connexion 2.15.0rc1) Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of October 04, 2025 Elad Kalif
• New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Shahar Epstein
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Dev iL
  • Re: New PMC members: VIncent Beck, Wei Lee and committer: Guan Ming Kevin Yang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages