Your offer has NOT been accepted at this time. Gris has a timeline in mind.
Kevin, I ask that you take a voluntary timeout from meta discussions at this point. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, 3:29 PM Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> wrote: > As I have volunteered for that effort we why do not need to wait to get > this groundwork done. > > There have been a number of comments by Rich and Bertrand in the past week > about how hard it is to get projects to respond. > > Regards, KAM > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, 12:34 Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:19 PM Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On 7/8/2019 1:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > >> re: pmcs/simple alias, from discussions in years, [email protected] was > > > >> considered a restricted email address that needed to meet pretty > > express > > > >> requirements to email. I'm pretty sure we need at least > coordination > > to > > > >> use it. > > > > Indeed: it should, in fact, be the Coordinator (as Outreachy defines > > > > that role, minus the fundraising aspects as I noted previously) that > > > > sends the message. Until one is appointed by the ASF, the person to > > > > send the message should be Gris. > > > > > > > > Yes, [email protected] should not be abused. It would be counter-productive > to > > > > have a number of people helping by sending email to that alias. > > > > > > Sorry to email again on this topic. You are focusing on the who sends > > > the email for the committee. That's not my point and I think your tact > > > for soliciting for Outreachy Organizer role makes sense. > > > > > > However, even after the committee coordinates the content and defines > > > who sends the email (which the coordinator sounds good), there have > been > > > restrictions on using [email protected]. I'm not sure who owns or approves > > > content sent to the alias but what I'm saying is we should coordinate > > > that and find out more. Who approves it or does it just send to all > the > > > private@ PMC addresses which will trigger their moderation? Does it > > > include the incubator, etc? Anyone know who we can ask more > information? > > > > David and I can handle the approval, moderation, etc. > > > > As to the remainder of your question(s): lets defer that until we have > > a message to be sent and an understanding as to how we are going to > > organize this effort. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > KAM > > > > > > -- > > > Kevin A. McGrail > > > Member, Apache Software Foundation > > > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > > > > - Sam Ruby > > >
