Who runs this one? https://github.com/mesos

Samuel Marks
Charity <https://sydneyscientific.org> | consultancy <https://offscale.io>
| open-source <https://github.com/offscale> | LinkedIn
<https://linkedin.com/in/samuelmarks>


On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:42 AM Charles-François Natali <cf.nat...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Rich,
>
> FWIW, I'm one of those people who said they were interested, and I
> still voted to move it to the attic (even though my vote is non
> binding as I'm not a committer).
>
> Initially I also thought that we could try to revive it within the
> ASF, but it quickly became clear that *none* of the current committers
> is willing to go down that route, i.e. put in the effort needed to
> onboard new committers. And without that, there's just no way forward.
> Various people voiced other concerns as well, such as viability of the
> project when other alternatives like Kubernetes exist, lack of clear
> technical direction for the future, etc.
> While they're relevant questions, I think currently they don't really
> make sense since the current Mesos community is basically dead.
> Finally, I think that the project should be moved to the Attic de
> facto because AFAICT the Apache rules require at least 3 *active*
> committers, and that's definitely not the case.
>
> However I still do believe in the project for the reasons I outlined
> in some of the previous threads, and I'm still interested in
> contributing: I just think that the current structure of the project
> is not suited for that anymore. And to be honest, I just want to move
> on, I'm tired of those endless discussions - it's been almost 2 months
> since the first thread stared, and nothing happened.
>
> It's a shame that we won't be able to continue using
> https://github.com/apache/mesos though, as it creates a much higher
> barrier to continuing the project.
>
> However if that's really not possible, then I guess that leaves no
> other option: once the vote has passed, I guess I'll start a final
> thread to gather people who'd be interested to create a new project
> forked off master on github, so we can start from scratch with our own
> repository, bug tracker etc. I hope those people who said they're
> actually interested will be willing to take an active part.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
>
>
> Le mer. 7 avr. 2021 à 02:50, Rich Bowen <rbo...@apache.org> a écrit :
> >
> > I hope y'all can forgive me for sticking my nose in, as a concerned
> member. Color me confused by this vote.
> >
> > A month ago, on this same list -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r307db648e201182fcf39b0de63ba224b94965501e20e6cbcecc085e4%40%3Cdev.mesos.apache.org%3E
> - Qian asked who was still interested in keeping the project going. SIX
> people responded that, given the chance, they'd step up and keep it going.
> >
> > Around that same time -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raed89cc5ab78531c48f56aa1989e1e7eb05f89a6941e38e9bc8803ff%40%3Cdev.mesos.apache.org%3E
> - Vinod observed that the too-high barrier to granting committer rights has
> been a major factor in the slowdown of the project.
> >
> > And yet, y'all are voting to attic the project.
> >
> > So, again, it's not my project, and I don't have a vote here, but the
> reason the Board asks projects to have these attic conversations on the Dev
> list is *specifically* so that interested people can say, hey, don't attic
> it, we'll take it from here. Which six people, plus Qian, have done.
> >
> > Maybe it's time to lower the barrier to entry, and let these willing
> people take the project forward, do so. The Board can work out the picky
> little details of re-forming the PMC, if that's a difficulty.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to