On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 17:56, Ernie Rael <[email protected]> wrote:
> But from what I can
> tell, the biggest problems with them was more about how they were used,
> not the infrastructure that downloaded them.

No, from my perspective, the biggest issues have been caused by the
infrastructure that downloaded them ...

> NB can download/install stuff from the plugin portal;

Yes, it can, let's use that!  JavaFX, and until now nb-javac, are
shipped in a "fake" update centre inside the IDE.  It can get flaky,
and the version of the dependency is baked into the IDE, so that to
ship updates requires a new IDE release just to change the links and
hash.  Not to mention that for the end user, they actually end up
going through multiple update notifications - one to change the
hashes, one to download the modules, which is confusing.

> Possibly download/install on
> demand though ergonomics, though I've heard some grumblings in that area.

Yes, lots from me! :-)  Not all the paths that trigger this in
ergonomics actually work very well (eg. in Tools / Options), and it's
quite possible to bypass the ergonomics support entirely.

What's wrong with putting X module in the plugin portal, and a
friendly notification that "This project requires X plugin", and a
button that guides people through the install process?  More guidance,
less voodoo, is a good thing.

Best wishes,

Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to