On 7/23/14, Emanuele <emanuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> It would be better if you use the site to show it. > > I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an > almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have > javascript enabled), only in "pure" HTML (no javascript required). The > difference is that it is generated while building the site, and being > the generation the point of my comment, I published only that part. > >> That said, the reason for the table is because we werent that open to >> use Javascript. We would still argue that we have a <noscript> code. >> >> Regardless if its XML, JSON or HTML or even a bash script to >> autogenerate the HTML from a sqlite datasource. > > Not sure what you want to say here: is it fine with you to use js? > Then it's fine with me as well. ;-)
Yes, sorry it didnt make sense, my point is how to allocate the information of the download, I think embeded in the JS is not good, and we could have a different feed (whenever XML, JSON or other). The point is to make it easily maintainable. > > Emanuele > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
