Option 1, 3, 4 could work. (I would prefer 1 for short term and 3 for long term) Option 2 is nonsense.
Either way, I just wanted to inform the list about the fact... Matthias Am 03.10.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > Go for which option? > Or do you mean option 4 with the "Go" language? > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > >> Go for it! ;-) >> >> >> Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >>> Now what: >>> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences >>> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us >> to? >>> 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform >> (*nix >>> users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK will be >>> available for 32 bit AOO). We have no Win64 AOO. >>> 3. Drop 32 bit versions of AOO and add Win64 support. >>> 4. Or drop Java entirely and port our Java code to eg. .NET core, which >> is >>> liberally licensed and private copies of it can be shipped? >>> >>> Damjan >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Matthias Seidel < >> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> It seems that Oracle pulled the 32-bit version of Java 9: >>>> >>>> https://twitter.com/mreinhold/status/912311207935090689 >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
