Hmm I was not answering you. Should have picked Damian mal.

The suggestion to use .net is to translate to c#. Or I misread. Sorry.

Am 4. Oktober 2017 20:50:06 MESZ schrieb Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
>Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>
>are you answering my mail or was this just a random reply?
>I'm wondering as I don't see anything new in your mail.
>
>> How relevant is Win 32 bit in future?
>
>0,0 %
>
>> Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run?
>
>Of course.
>
>> Why move to C#? I do not see the benefit.
>
>Nobody wants to move to C#.
>
>Marcus
>
>
>
>> Am 3. Oktober 2017 23:18:12 MESZ schrieb Marcus
><marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
>>> Am 03.10.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Fernando Cassia <fcas...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/3/17, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Now what:
>>>>>> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the
>>> licences
>>>>>> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library)
>allow
>>> us
>>>>> to?
>>>>>> 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected
>>> platform
>>>>> (*nix
>>>>>> users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK
>>> will be
>>>>>> available for 32 bit AOO). We have no Win64 AOO.
>>>>>> 3. Drop 32 bit versions of AOO and add Win64 support.
>>>>>> 4. Or drop Java entirely and port our Java code to eg. .NET core,
>>> which
>>>>> is
>>>>>> liberally licensed and private copies of it can be shipped?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Damjan
>>>>>
>>>>> Tempest in a teapot. You do know that Oracle isn't the only
>provider
>>>>> of Java or OpenJDK, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Options
>>>>> 1. You can buiild your own 32-bit x86 binary based on OpenJDK
>>> sources.
>>>>> 2. make AOO compile OK on 64 bit thus making AOO a 64-bit Windows
>>> app,
>>>>> able to use any 64-bit JRE (Oracle JRE, IBM JRE, Azul's Zulu JRE)
>>>>> 3. Have you asked Azul Systems if they can provide a 32-bit build?
>>>>> 4. Compile the Java code in AOO as native with Java 9's AOT
>>> compiler?
>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/295
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my $0.02
>>>>> FC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ​As a bystander, I'm wondering just how alarming this news is to
>>> Apache
>>>> OpenOffice.
>>>
>>> IMHO not at all. Java 9 was published just 2 weeks ago. So, it will
>>> take
>>> some time until it's the favorite one. Until then 8 is developer's
>>> darling.
>>>
>>>> The builds are using Java 6 or 7, right?​
>>>
>>> With the next larger release (probably 4.2.0) we will use Java 8
>which
>>> should last a longer time. Time enough to decide what to do with the
>>> dependency of Java 32-bit.
>>>
>>>>    I'm still on 32-bit Linux for now but my default OpenJDK is 1.8.
>I
>>> can run
>>>> AOO fine with it but must use 1.7 for building.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to