Hmm I was not answering you. Should have picked Damian mal. The suggestion to use .net is to translate to c#. Or I misread. Sorry.
Am 4. Oktober 2017 20:50:06 MESZ schrieb Marcus <[email protected]>: >Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs: > >are you answering my mail or was this just a random reply? >I'm wondering as I don't see anything new in your mail. > >> How relevant is Win 32 bit in future? > >0,0 % > >> Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run? > >Of course. > >> Why move to C#? I do not see the benefit. > >Nobody wants to move to C#. > >Marcus > > > >> Am 3. Oktober 2017 23:18:12 MESZ schrieb Marcus ><[email protected]>: >>> Am 03.10.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Kay Schenk: >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Fernando Cassia <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/3/17, Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Now what: >>>>>> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the >>> licences >>>>>> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) >allow >>> us >>>>> to? >>>>>> 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected >>> platform >>>>> (*nix >>>>>> users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK >>> will be >>>>>> available for 32 bit AOO). We have no Win64 AOO. >>>>>> 3. Drop 32 bit versions of AOO and add Win64 support. >>>>>> 4. Or drop Java entirely and port our Java code to eg. .NET core, >>> which >>>>> is >>>>>> liberally licensed and private copies of it can be shipped? >>>>>> >>>>>> Damjan >>>>> >>>>> Tempest in a teapot. You do know that Oracle isn't the only >provider >>>>> of Java or OpenJDK, right? >>>>> >>>>> Options >>>>> 1. You can buiild your own 32-bit x86 binary based on OpenJDK >>> sources. >>>>> 2. make AOO compile OK on 64 bit thus making AOO a 64-bit Windows >>> app, >>>>> able to use any 64-bit JRE (Oracle JRE, IBM JRE, Azul's Zulu JRE) >>>>> 3. Have you asked Azul Systems if they can provide a 32-bit build? >>>>> 4. Compile the Java code in AOO as native with Java 9's AOT >>> compiler? >>>>> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/295 >>>>> >>>>> Just my $0.02 >>>>> FC >>>>> >>>>> >>>> As a bystander, I'm wondering just how alarming this news is to >>> Apache >>>> OpenOffice. >>> >>> IMHO not at all. Java 9 was published just 2 weeks ago. So, it will >>> take >>> some time until it's the favorite one. Until then 8 is developer's >>> darling. >>> >>>> The builds are using Java 6 or 7, right? >>> >>> With the next larger release (probably 4.2.0) we will use Java 8 >which >>> should last a longer time. Time enough to decide what to do with the >>> dependency of Java 32-bit. >>> >>>> I'm still on 32-bit Linux for now but my default OpenJDK is 1.8. >I >>> can run >>>> AOO fine with it but must use 1.7 for building. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
