I was thinking about naming and came up with ideas like...

- trace4j
- dsp4j (digital signal processing, that is)
- pluse (as we detect pulses and stuff)
- oscilloscope <-- I quite like that, it fits quite well as we really look into 

What are thoughts on those?


Am 08.09.19, 22:38 schrieb "Niclas Hedhman" <nic...@hedhman.org>:

    peanut gallery; I would recommend a descriptive name, in format of "PLC4X
    Abc", rather than a stand-alone name. Somewhere in the future, you may have
    a dozen of these and one wouldn't know where to start looking.
    On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:51 AM Julian Feinauer 
    > Hi all,
    > I just discussed (off-list) with Justin the next steps needed.
    > They are
    > * fill out software grant (pm)
    > * Start IP clearance vote on incubator list (JF)
    > * Gather ICLA from all contributors of CRUNCH
    > Parallel I’d like to start a discuss on how we should call it as PLC4X
    > subproject.
    > Any ideas or suggestions?
    > Julian
    Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
    http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Reply via email to