Hi,

although I agree with Chris and Kai (better name things functionally) I 
personally prefer something like 'osciloscope' as it transpoets the intent of 
the lib better than 'process' or 'compute'-

Oscilloscopes are known to help you with analyzing signals, in fact Wikipedia 
states:

"The waveform can then be analyzed for properties such as amplitude, frequency, 
rise time, time interval, distortion, and others. Modern digital instruments 
may calculate and display these properties directly. Originally, calculation of 
these values required manually measuring the waveform against the scales built 
into the screen of the instrument.[3]"

So I think this is the name I prefer most, especially because it brings the 
intent as close as possible.

Julian


Am 16.09.19, 02:36 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" 
<matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de>:

    +1 for that. I am not a fan of fancy cool names 😊. So Processing / Filter / 
SignalWatchDog would be better for me.
    
    Greetings Mathi
    Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
    
    Universität Stuttgart
    Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und 
Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
    
    Seidenstraße 36
    70174 Stuttgart
    GERMANY
    
    Tel: +49 711 685-84530
    Fax: +49 711 685-74530
    
    E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de
    Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
    
    -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
    Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 
    Gesendet: Sunday, September 15, 2019 7:09 PM
    An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
    Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename CRUNCH to something different
    
    Hi all,
    
    The thing with Oszilloskope and dsp that I see, ist that für me it sort off 
relates to hard- and not Software (but that might just be me).
    
    I was discussing this with Julian here at apachecon and I quite like the 
idea of calling the current layer "PLC4X connect" and the new one "PLC4X 
process".
    
    Chris
    
    Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
    
    ________________________________
    From: Tim Mitsch <t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de>
    Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 9:43:13 AM
    To: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
    Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename CRUNCH to something different
    
    Hey,
    
    As i'm electrical engineer i like the name oscilloscope.
    But full ack to Kai, name should be clearer.
    Furthermore i like Kai's suggestion PLC4X DSP as it is short and clear what 
Crunch does ... processing and analyzing digitalized data. Maybe we could also 
call it PLC4X MSP for 'Mixed Signal Processing' or any other artifical acronym.
    
    Best
    Tim
    
    Am 15.09.19, 18:20 schrieb "Kai Wähner" <megachu...@gmail.com>:
    
        I would vote for something like Niclas proposed. Much clearer than 
having
        yet another product / component name...
    
        For instance, PLC4X DSP, PLC4X Signal Processor, or something what 
clearly
        describes in one or two words / shortcuts what the component does.
    
        See Kafka and its ecosystem: Kafka Connect, Kafka Streams, Confluent 
Schema
        Registry, Confluent Rest Proxy, Confluent Control Center, etc...
    
        Kai
    
        On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 9:05 AM Julian Feinauer <
        j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:
    
        > Hi,
        >
        > I was thinking about naming and came up with ideas like...
        >
        > - trace4j
        > - dsp4j (digital signal processing, that is)
        > - pluse (as we detect pulses and stuff)
        > - oscilloscope <-- I quite like that, it fits quite well as we really 
look
        > into signals
        >
        > What are thoughts on those?
        >
        > J
        >
        > Am 08.09.19, 22:38 schrieb "Niclas Hedhman" <nic...@hedhman.org>:
        >
        >     peanut gallery; I would recommend a descriptive name, in format of
        > "PLC4X
        >     Abc", rather than a stand-alone name. Somewhere in the future, 
you may
        > have
        >     a dozen of these and one wouldn't know where to start looking.
        >
        >     Cheers
        >     Niclas
        >
        >     On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:51 AM Julian Feinauer <
        > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
        >     wrote:
        >
        >     > Hi all,
        >     >
        >     > I just discussed (off-list) with Justin the next steps needed.
        >     > They are
        >     >
        >     > * fill out software grant (pm)
        >     > * Start IP clearance vote on incubator list (JF)
        >     > * Gather ICLA from all contributors of CRUNCH
        >     >
        >     > Parallel I’d like to start a discuss on how we should call it as
        > PLC4X
        >     > subproject.
        >     >
        >     > Any ideas or suggestions?
        >     >
        >     > Julian
        >     >
        >
        >
        >     --
        >     Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
        >     http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
        >
        >
        >
    
    
    

Reply via email to