Or "PLC4X compute"... That one I forgot, but found again ;-)

Chris

Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 11:09:11 AM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename CRUNCH to something different

Hi all,

The thing with Oszilloskope and dsp that I see, ist that für me it sort off 
relates to hard- and not Software (but that might just be me).

I was discussing this with Julian here at apachecon and I quite like the idea 
of calling the current layer "PLC4X connect" and the new one "PLC4X process".

Chris

Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Tim Mitsch <t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de>
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 9:43:13 AM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Rename CRUNCH to something different

Hey,

As i'm electrical engineer i like the name oscilloscope.
But full ack to Kai, name should be clearer.
Furthermore i like Kai's suggestion PLC4X DSP as it is short and clear what 
Crunch does ... processing and analyzing digitalized data. Maybe we could also 
call it PLC4X MSP for 'Mixed Signal Processing' or any other artifical acronym.

Best
Tim

Am 15.09.19, 18:20 schrieb "Kai Wähner" <megachu...@gmail.com>:

    I would vote for something like Niclas proposed. Much clearer than having
    yet another product / component name...

    For instance, PLC4X DSP, PLC4X Signal Processor, or something what clearly
    describes in one or two words / shortcuts what the component does.

    See Kafka and its ecosystem: Kafka Connect, Kafka Streams, Confluent Schema
    Registry, Confluent Rest Proxy, Confluent Control Center, etc...

    Kai

    On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 9:05 AM Julian Feinauer <
    j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > I was thinking about naming and came up with ideas like...
    >
    > - trace4j
    > - dsp4j (digital signal processing, that is)
    > - pluse (as we detect pulses and stuff)
    > - oscilloscope <-- I quite like that, it fits quite well as we really look
    > into signals
    >
    > What are thoughts on those?
    >
    > J
    >
    > Am 08.09.19, 22:38 schrieb "Niclas Hedhman" <nic...@hedhman.org>:
    >
    >     peanut gallery; I would recommend a descriptive name, in format of
    > "PLC4X
    >     Abc", rather than a stand-alone name. Somewhere in the future, you may
    > have
    >     a dozen of these and one wouldn't know where to start looking.
    >
    >     Cheers
    >     Niclas
    >
    >     On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:51 AM Julian Feinauer <
    > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
    >     wrote:
    >
    >     > Hi all,
    >     >
    >     > I just discussed (off-list) with Justin the next steps needed.
    >     > They are
    >     >
    >     > * fill out software grant (pm)
    >     > * Start IP clearance vote on incubator list (JF)
    >     > * Gather ICLA from all contributors of CRUNCH
    >     >
    >     > Parallel I’d like to start a discuss on how we should call it as
    > PLC4X
    >     > subproject.
    >     >
    >     > Any ideas or suggestions?
    >     >
    >     > Julian
    >     >
    >
    >
    >     --
    >     Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
    >     http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
    >
    >
    >


Reply via email to