Quoting Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Sure, they are nicer, in that they are more focused. I'd like to see some other alternatives, however.
Louis, could you make the proposed change while you consider the other options? Pondering and changing are not mutually exclusive activities.
And just what types of alternatives would you like to see? What is the problem with updating the web page, is it technical or is it content or is it something else? Is it the CRM being used? Please be polite, but do be explicit. I and others seem to be missing what the obstacle is.
I really think we need to get on a 6 month release cycle. Where changes are applied every 6 months and major releases are done every 8 months since it doesnt just affect the homepage.
Yes, the site has to adapt to the world changing around it to remain relevant. Specific events, articles, trends and seasonal activities all influence that. The pages also have to keep pace with the product as well as with both its rising market penetration and mindshare.
A good example is the spanish site. The site didn't move (as far as changes go) since version 1.1.1. The canges were sporadically, since I jump in the site, the page has been re-design almost 5 times. That includes season changes (christmass, OOo aniversary, etc), to actual reshape of content.
The Spanish page has been a very good example of how to keep a site fresh.
-Lars
Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Internet is for Everyone:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt?number=3271--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
