>Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >>> Second, the support page is very bad, it's overwhelming, half the >>> links are not very useful, and most links don't fit on the concept >>> of "support" >> >> Using the bad design of other pages as argument why the front page >> should fulfill the task instead is invalid. > >No, it's valid until the other page gets fixed. And at the rate OOo >moves that's going to be a long time. If I could trust the support >page to be fixed soon I might agree with you. I have *TRIED* to get >the support page updated, and nothing.
Really? When was that? We can do it now, anyway. If Kay is agreeable, I would like to create a new mail list for fixing the support page. The requirement would be to work with Documentation project. But I am all for getting that page fixed. I think that the homepage redesign is going along well enough so that there will not be distraction, especially if a new list is used for discussions. [snip] >> >> I as well thing that developers will know how to find their pages, >> so better call it "Contributing" (we have a nice contibuting page) > >If the "development" tab is replaced by a "contributing" tab that goes >to the contributing page I'll be happy. Somehow I'm not holdin gmy >breath. The Development pages are not at all the same as the "Contributing" pages. Let's say we add to Development landing page two buttons: * Contributing Code * Contributing Other Works With the bottom one sending people to "Contributing" pages. The top tab could then read, "Contributing." But that makes it one step more difficult for those who are not already developers of OOo to find out how to become such. That is why I prefer to have a tab that says, "Developer." To make it seem as if we are interested in *new* developers. Cheers, Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
