On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:34:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Wherever it lives, this would be read by Bodhi, so there's
> > would be need to enter it more than once. And, perhaps a DNF plugin
> > could be made to read and display this information for systems
> > administrators.
> I fully support the removal of RPM changelogs.  However, you've missed
> two cases:
> 1) Rawhide, which doesn't go through bodhi
> 2) Fedora release upgrades, which don't go through bodhi

I'm actually suggesting something different: write the user-focused
changelog in one place when updating the package, and have bodhi read
that and use it for its description (making the bodhi step less work).

Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to