On Monday, 14 September 2026 at 12:01, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 11 September 2026 at 18:16, Zerotwo02 wrote:
> > Problem: package glycin-loaders-2.2~beta-1.fc45.i686 from fedora requires
> > libheif.so.1, but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package libheif-1.23.3-2.fc45.i686 from updates-testing requires
> > libavcodec.so.62, but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package libheif-1.23.3-2.fc45.i686 from updates-testing requires
> > libavcodec.so.62(LIBAVCODEC_62), but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package libheif-1.23.3-2.fc45.i686 from fedora requires
> > libavcodec.so.62, but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package libheif-1.23.3-2.fc45.i686 from fedora requires
> > libavcodec.so.62(LIBAVCODEC_62), but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package libavcodec-free-8.1.2-12.fc45.i686 from fedora requires
> > libopenh264.so.8, but none of the providers can be installed
> > - package openh264-2.6.0-3.fc45.x86_64 from fedora-cisco-openh264
> > obsoletes noopenh264 < 1:0 provided by noopenh264-2.6.0-5.fc45.i686 from
> > fedora
> > - problem with installed package
> > - problem with installed package
> > - openh264-2.6.0-3.fc44.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > - libheif-1.21.2-1.fc44.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > - glycin-loaders-2.1.5-1.fc44.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade
> > repository
> > You can try to add to command line:
> > --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages
> >
> > This is what i got
>
> This is probably a bug in the openh264 package, because it tries to
> obsolete all installed noopenh264 packages, including the i686 one, but
> there's no i686 build of the openh264 package in the Cisco repo to
> resolve the libopenh264.so.8 dependency from libavcodec-free.i686.
Or, actually, an RPM limitation. Obsoletes: can only reference package
names, not virtual Provides, so %{_isa} is not allowed in Obsoletes:.
This means we really need the x86_64 Cisco-hosted repository to be
multilib and contain i686 RPMs of openh264 as well to fix this.
Apparently, this is a known issue:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/12473
Regards,
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
-- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
