El 14/04/16 a les 17:54, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-announce ha escrit:
> On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:28:29 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
>> El 12/04/16 a les 14:26, Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-announce ha
>>>> I assume that the DMD package from dlang, or better d-apt, sets the d-
>>>> compiler property. Should dmd be prefered if it is present?
>>> I think so, since when installing it from non-free 3rd-party sources, the
>>> user made an explicit choice for DMD.
>>> In terms of packaging, the packaging doesn't really care, any D compiler
>>> will satisfy the requirements of the dub package.
>> No, dmd deb packages from dlang and d-apt do not set any d-compiler
>> property. Where should it be set?
> I think with "property" you mean "virtual package". See
> Basically, the dmd package needs a "Provides: d-compiler" line, then it
> should be able to satisfy the dependencies of the dub package.
Thanks. What happen is multiple packages, all of them not installed, sets
"Provides: d-compiler"? Which one is installed?