So far so much better :)

I really appreciate all answers given so far. Sorry I haven't found a way to reply to everyone.

Many seems to be using the forum's web interface as a second - tier of interaction. I still don't know what can justify this practice. But anyway, for the time being I downloaded seamonkey (because I was searching for a NNTP client). I actually find it easier to read the 'forum' in Seamonkey.

As a test, I am replying directly through Seamonkey.

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/23/18 8:47 AM, biocyberman wrote:
Want to learn something from you guys. is by far the biggest gathering point for Dlang users. So, even though I wanted to get away with using, I have to come back here. However, to me it easier for me, I would like to know how you guys get comfortable with using the forum?

 From my experience with forum platforms like vBulletin, phpBB, Invision Power, and even interfaces of Google group, and Github Issues, I still find it very difficult to understand the logics of using dlang's forum. FYI, I am not a new user of internet, I'd rather consider myself someone can take pain to learn new useful things. And I've administered some forums myself. Yet I would like to name a few things below. They may irritate some hard-working contributors of dlang community. But I by no means want to make this a discussion of hate. So, how do you guys overcome these problems:

thunderbird NNTP client.

1. No post editting. After clicking send, and found out that you made mistakes in the post, but you can't edit the post anymore.

Meh, its possible with NNTP, but this also allows abuse of editing. I don't find this that horrible. Maybe pay attention to the spelling corrector?

2. Old-day quoting presentation. I always feel reluctant to read texts that stays after two levels of quotes, like this:
  >First post quoted
  >>Second post quoted
  >>>Third post quoted
  >>Second post quoted

Thunderbird substitutes those with nice colored bars, so I can easily see the level of quotes.

3. No Rich-text format support. No minimal bold/italic support. Some tools to emphasize important points will make it easier to let the readers know what the posters want to say.

TB has these, though I prefer plain text. It supports a crude form of markdown, so *bold*, _underline_ all are enhanced by TB. Emoticons turn into graphics too ;)

4.  No code formatting. Same feeling here. I am reluctant to post more than 5 lines of code.

You can use a link to a code sample on which allows your code to be tested in the browser as a bonus.

5. No image support. In many cases a screenshots will be helpful to communicate problems.

Yeah, this is a limitation I'm not sure how it can be overcome.

6. Last but not least, a trendy feature: tags, keywords for threads so we can locate related threads easily.

If you want to tag posts on your own, TB does this.


Reply via email to