After re-reading what I just wrote, I realize that the double-verify is not
the issue. I'll resend to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsadmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: denied-transfers
>
>
>
> This is exactly our problem.
>
> 1. Client paid $70 to Netsol in February
> 2. Netsol added 2 years to domain, making it expire in 2003
> (WHOIS shows it too)
> 3. Netsol keeps harassing client for payment, threatening to deactivate
> 4. Client is running away from Netsol because of the nonsense.
> 5. Our transfer requests fail, because Netsol believes it is owed
> money, eventhough WHOIS says different, and client has proof of payment.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Daminato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:31 AM
> > To: dnsadmin
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: denied-transfers
> >
> >
> > afaik (I'm verifying this) [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a
> mechanism
> > to expidiate transfer requests, but more of a repository for
> complaints to
> > assist our cause in getting these 'double verify' problems
> sorted out with
> > other registrars.
> >
> > Charles Daminato
> > TUCOWS Product Manager
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, dnsadmin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How long to get a response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
> > >
> > > I sent it Thursday, about 24 hours ago. Does this mean if I do
> > not get an
> > > answer today (Friday), I have to wait until Monday?
> > >
> > > If so, that will be 72 hours for a response. Not good, when the
> > domain is
> > > expiring soon at the old registrar.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
