yes...
this is why many of us aren't so mad about this double-checking thing.
personally, i'm very glad that opensrs has given me the opportunity to
deny domains that might be transferred away to some less altruistic :)
registrar without me even knowing about it.
before folks start flaming here, of course i get p*ssed when i get an
incorrect NACK from register.com, nsi, etc.
:-)
> I got one of these on 7/12/01 as well. I REALLY hate to say it, but in
> this case I did not request the domain be transferred. I assume that
> someone did, either by mistake or purposely. I also didn't receive
> anything from the 'winning' registrar yet, so (God, this kills me) if
> Register.com didn't send this e-mail, or if the default was to allow the
> transfer to proceed if not denied, then I may have lost this domain if I
> were taking a long weekend. I still don't like Register.com's policy,
> ESPECIALLY the sales pitch, price comparison, and link to automatically
> renew, that's in their transfer verification e-mail. But if the winning
> registrar can't be depended upon to verify the transfers - well, draw
> you own conclusions. I'm torn on this issue.
>
> Hopefully, the winning registrar will send me a verification e-mail
> soon, but I thought I should have received it before register.com's.
> That's how it works when transferring to OpenSRS.
>
