On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Jeff White wrote:

> It disturbs me that some in our profession think a persona can be  
> non-data driven. It's bad for our profession if we have people out  
> there calling their guesswork personas. As you say, personas have been
> well defined by many in our field for a long time. Heck, just the  
> general concepts that 1) user research is important, and 2) that it  
> should be based on well conducted, objective, non-biased techniques  
> and data is the core concept of UCD and should be common knowledge  
> to any UCD practitioner[...]
>
> Why is this happening and what can we do to fight it?

Education.

This disturbs me as well. This past year I taught a full day workshop  
on crafting data-driven design research personas—this is my fourth  
time teaching such a workshop/class. Just like every other time I've  
taught it, I began by asking, by a show of hands, how many people have  
actually been involved in persona creation—little more than half. When  
asked how they learned the methods they used to create personas, I get  
the same responses:

1. "I read About Face."
2. "I looked at other sample personas."
3. "I worked with someone who had done them before."
4. "I read the Persona Lifecycle book." (this one was new)

First of all, About Face, while I love the book, doesn't actually  
describe in great detail how to create personas. It talks about them,  
but doesn't describe the craft particularly well. The fact is that  
there are very few detailed resources available for how-tos on  
constructing personas that are data-driven (the only true persona as  
far as I'm concerned). The most thorough book might be the Persona  
Lifecycle, but I don't find it particularly useful for a number of  
reasons I've already stated in the past.

Looking at other examples of personas—frankly, I find that a bit  
scary. I don't know of too many good persona examples out there. Even  
Forrester, who has a scoring system for personas, which while not as  
comprehensive as what I expect, does provide a pretty good measure for  
personas, sampled close to two dozen firms for persona work this past  
year and only 2 came out with passing grades—2 out of 23-25. What does  
that say about the quality of persona work coming out of our field  
today?

So, how do we fight it? Education. Those of us who can, also need to  
teach.


Cheers!

Todd Zaki Warfel
President, Design Researcher
Messagefirst | Designing Information. Beautifully.
----------------------------------
Contact Info
Voice:  (215) 825-7423
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog:   http://toddwarfel.com
----------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same.
In practice, they are not.



________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to