Whoa there Dave,

While not getting into all you've stated, but ...

It seems there's 3 or 4 examples in this single thread of teams successfully
integrating "true design" with Agile methodologies, (with "true design"
meaning solutions design, not research or academic theory).

And as far as "one culture dominating" you stated it well indicating that
certain team members have more say at certain junctures in the SDLC. Why
would it not be optimal to have certain parts of the team dominate when
their stage of the process is the central focus?

>Maybe there is a way to integrate true design methods (not research
methods,
>but design methods) into a software agile methodology, but I haven't seen
or
>heard of it, nor have I really seen anyone attempt to design such a
>system--one where no single culture dominates the team.

>To do software
>correctly requires deep strategic and tactical planning with a holistic and
>deeply forward thinking view.

-- dave

Agreed totally with your last statement, but this in no way negates "Design"
working with "Agile methodologies".

-- 
Joseph Rich Rogan
President UX/UI Inc.
http://www.jrrogan.com
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to