I was under the impression that persona's based on assumptions were called
assumptive personas, and should be treated as such.

I vaguely recall being told about a research company (the name escapes me)
who have a system that require field researchers to tag their fieldnotes.
These tags get aggregated into categories, and ultimately, personas are
generated that consist of a series of hyperlinked statements. The reader can
click on any statement and "drill in" to get the field notes. In theory this
means you get data-backed personas that are accountable for their claims.

Any opinions on this?

Harry
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to