On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:31 AM, James Page wrote:

@todd

The issue here is that personas are a generalisation of the user base. As Christine Boese a couple of months back on the list said:

Yes, and the problem with that is?

Descriptive, rich, qualitative methods are by definition NOT generalizable. That would be the whole point. One can inductively triangulate data, amass evidence that reinforces emerging categories of data, develop heuristics, and even conduct parallel studies and discover points of intersection between similar qualitative or ethnographic-type studies.

So replicate to some extent, but generalize, never.

Bullocks.

We just spent the better part of last week working through 1000+ data points collected from qualitative research, synthesizing, looking for patterns and finding 19 themes, each with subgroups/themes. Those themes showed a definite pattern. From those patterns, or generalizations, were identifiable across customers of various sizes and industries.

The individual stories might not be able to be generalized, but there are definite patterns that can be found and used to communicate what it's like for your customers and to provide empathy and understanding.

When writers merge real life characters together the work becomes fiction. How do get around the challenge of theory?

Bullocks again. How do doctors identify illnesses? Not every single case of lung cancer is identical. Are you going to claim that lung cancer is theoretical?

 How do you communicate your research findings to your clients?
For qualitative data probably very similar to the way you communicate to clients but the mapping is one to one, not many people summarised as one.

Can you describe how you communicate the mappings one to one? How would you communicate findings from 40+ interviews across 17 different customers from 5 different countries?

The time saving is because you do not have to create a pseudo person between the research, and the report. As more information is discovered it is very easy to add to the knowledge base.

The time spent on creating a persona is saved in spades against the time spent trying to communicate individual stories of 30-100 individuals and the edge case arguments that come from not having the data.


Cheers!

Todd Zaki Warfel
Principal Design Researcher
Messagefirst | Designing Information. Beautifully.
----------------------------------
Contact Info
Voice:  (215) 825-7423
Email:  [email protected]
AIM:    [email protected]
Blog:   http://toddwarfel.com
Twitter:        zakiwarfel
----------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same.
In practice, they are not.




________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to