And I think that calling a willing research participant in a simulated
environment, a Darwin Award candidate is a disservice to all those
that take part in our research!
On Aug 20, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Andrei Herasimchuk wrote:
It doesn't take expensive eye-tracking devices to determine that if
someone is texting while driving, they are probably a good candidate
for a Darwin Award.
To toss this little nugget into the mix as some valid if minor
counterpoint to Jared's stated opposition to eye-tracking is really
a disservice to how much Jared actually knows about this topic, and
how much experience and expertise he has in research and technology.
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Elizabeth Buie wrote:
I know that's not what you're talking about Jared, so I'm not
really arguing
against you. I'm just pointing out that there are some cases where
it *is*
helpful -- even necessary -- to know where people are looking, and
for how
long. Or, more specifically, where they are NOT looking.
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
