Perhaps a little social engineering could serve you well.  You could  
force users to click through a web page (much like you see when you  
get on at a coffee shop) that displays a sufficiently scary notice  
about how traffic is monitored across the network.



On Mar 22, 2007, at 7:24 AM, Steve Shapery wrote:

> I guess I wasn't clear in my initial tirade about why I tore down  
> the node.
>
> In general, I've seen 4-6 people on the node at any given time,
> sending email, surfing the web, browsing YouTube, whatever.
>
> but then within 5 days, I saw none of the regular nodes, and I saw
> six new ones online, all doing P2P at the same time.
>
> different apps, different versions, different servers.
>
> But they were the only apps I saw live for days at a time.
>
> I guess the crux of my issue is that they so blatantly abused the
> service, and that also I couldn't get the P2P completely blocked,
> either through MW or through my Cisco with NBAR.
>
> but when one runs across people puilling 14 mbit of P2P over ones'
> wire, one tends to get irked.
>
>
>          -S
>
>
> At 09:33 PM 3/21/2007, you wrote:
>> FWIW, we do some bandwidth shaping already. M0n0wall has some  
>> built in
>> rules to elevate traffic like email and ssh and push down known P2P
>> (based chiefly on port numbers), leaving http in the middle. See the
>> m0n0wall docs for more details.
>>
>> Re logging of data, I've heard it every way. You shouldn't keep logs
>> because then you can't get into trouble for not providing them, or  
>> get
>> sued by someone subsequently because you did provide them and  
>> shouldn't
>> have. You should keep logs so you can be a responsible citizen and  
>> help
>> the authorities track things down, and also show that it wasn't  
>> you. Or
>> you should keep logs, but anonymize them sufficiently to show that it
>> wasn't you, but you can't tell who it really was.
>>
>> We briefly toyed with the idea of keeping logs and making them all
>> public all the time, but then it was pointed out that they could  
>> be used
>> by stalkers.  Currently we don't keep logs because the donated syslog
>> server we were using has died. Before then we used to keep dhcp lease
>> logs only. We do have limited logs on the m0n0wall gateways, but they
>> expire quickly. Meraki keeps logs, and I don't know exactly what  
>> their
>> policy is (though now I'll ask!).
>>
>> Its a fascinating topic (though not to all, as a couple of recent
>> unsubscribes suggest!). I'll be happy to continue in person at  
>> tomorrow
>> night's monthly meeting if anyone who attends is interested.
>> http://socalfreenet.org/node/751
>>
>> cheers, michael
>> --
>> Michael Mee
>> 858-531-0735
>> www.socalfreenet.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
>> To unsubscribe, please visit:
>> http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
> To unsubscribe, please visit: http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/ 
> listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org


_______________________________________________
SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List
To unsubscribe, please visit: 
http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org

Reply via email to