election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Date

• 2005/05/21 [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Chris Benham
• 2005/05/21 [EM] Kevin--The 3-slot method MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/21 [EM] Month typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/21 [EM] Markus, 22 Marach, '05, 0318 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/21 [EM] Eurovision Song Contest results Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/05/20 [EM] RE: resistance to raffles (was assumption of sincere ballots) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/20 Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/20 Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/19 [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots Chris Benham
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] RE: fun example Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] IRV with approval James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/19 [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/19 [EM] Re: An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/19 [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/19 [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/19 RE: [EM] RE: fun example Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/19 [EM] RE: fun example Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/19 [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/19 [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm) Chris Benham
• 2005/05/19 [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Chris Benham
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/19 Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/18 [EM] Part 2, Re: Mike: Strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/18 [EM] Election via Proxies - correction Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/18 [EM] New policy: No personal criticisms in on-topic discussion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/18 [EM] Markus, 19 May, '05, 0114 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/18 [EM] A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/18 [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] IRV with approval Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] IRV with approval Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/18 RE: [EM] Canadians on the way... James Gilmour
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/18 [EM] IRV with approval Sean Harris
• 2005/05/18 [EM] Canadians on the way... stephane.rouillon
• 2005/05/18 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/17 Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/17 [EM] Markus, 18 May, '05, 0423 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/17 [EM] More Paul MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/17 [EM] strange 2-dim. fun example Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/05/17 Re: [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting Bill Clark
• 2005/05/17 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/17 [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/16 [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/16 [EM] Markus--Who introduced SSD to EM? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/16 RE: [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/16 [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/15 [EM] Re: Criteria reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/15 [EM] DMC/RAV and FBC Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/15 Re: [EM] FBC Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/15 [EM] One more thought on Arrow Alex Small
• 2005/05/15 Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/15 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/15 [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Alex Small
• 2005/05/14 Re: [EM] Criteria reply Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Re: The issue of comments about Arrow's impossibility theorem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/14 RE: [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Comments on additional posting about Arrow's CC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Criteria reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/14 RE: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/14 [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 [EM] FBC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Re: Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/14 [EM] Need copy of digest issue 22 (never received) RLSuter
• 2005/05/14 Re: [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/13 [EM] Re: Name Capitalization. enforcement, etc. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/13 [EM] Paul: Logical arguments MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/13 [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. Stephane Rouillon
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/13 [EM] arrow's, wikipedia part II Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/13 [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/13 [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. stephane.rouillon
• 2005/05/13 [EM] WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates Kevin Venzke
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] irony Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bill Clark
• 2005/05/13 Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
• 2005/05/12 RE: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
• 2005/05/12 RE: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/12 [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] problematic participants Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/12 RE: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/12 RE: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/12 [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/12 [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] irony Eric Gorr
• 2005/05/12 [EM] irony Alex Small
• 2005/05/12 [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/12 [EM] Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/05/12 RE: [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform James Gilmour
• 2005/05/12 [EM] problematic participants Andrew Myers
• 2005/05/12 [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform Stephen Turner
• 2005/05/12 Re: [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/11 Re: [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/11 Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/11 [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/11 [EM] Saddam Declares Victory! Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/11 [EM] Clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/11 [EM] Summary--Unstated CC assumptions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/11 [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/10 Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/10 Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/10 Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/05/10 [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/10 [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Chris Benham
• 2005/05/10 [EM] update on classroom creation question James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/10 [EM] link to web site James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/10 Re: [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method? Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Re: Over the top personal comments Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/09 Re: [EM] Over the top personal comments Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/09 Re: [EM] Over the top personal comments Eric Gorr
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Over the top personal comments Rob Lanphier
• 2005/05/09 Re: [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/09 Re: [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/05/09 [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Mike: CWP (was: SFC) James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/09 [EM] Mike: WV (was: SFC) James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/08 Re: [EM] Russ's criteriai postingse Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/08 [EM] Russ's criteriai postings MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/08 RE: [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law James Gilmour
• 2005/05/08 Re: [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/08 Re: [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law Bart Ingles
• 2005/05/08 Re: [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Anthony Duff
• 2005/05/08 [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Chris Benham
• 2005/05/07 [EM] Part 2, Re: James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/07 Re: [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/07 [EM] Part 1, Re: James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/07 [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/07 Re: [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/07 Re: [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/07 Re: [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/07 [EM] AWP vs. S/WPO James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/06 [EM] general understanding of majority and mutual majority criteria? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/06 Re: [EM] James, SFC James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/06 [EM] Re: Duverger's law and British elections MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/06 [EM] James, SFC , Contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/06 [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/06 [EM] 2004 baseball grid, revisited Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/06 [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/06 [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
• 2005/05/06 [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
• 2005/05/06 [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
• 2005/05/06 [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/06 [EM] Mike: malfunctioning criteria? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/06 [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Alex Small
• 2005/05/05 [EM] James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/05 [EM] Re: Pareto MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/05 [EM] Re: James, meaningfulness and sameness MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/05 [EM] Markus--Your example does show that ERIRV(f) fails WDSC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/05 [EM] Re: AWP versus DMC and AM Chris Benham
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/04 [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/04 [EM] Pareto MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] percentage support continued Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] percentage support continued James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/04 RE: [EM] percentage support continued Paul Kislanko
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] percentage support continued Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/04 [EM] percentage support continued Curt Siffert
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? Markus Schulze
• 2005/05/04 [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/04 Re: [EM] RE: approval and pareto James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/03 Re: [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness) James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/03 Re: [EM] Percentage Support Dave Ketchum
• 2005/05/03 [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] James--IRV mitigation compromises MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] Accidental duplicate posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] Percentage Support MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] James--Then CP passes SFC, with a patch MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] James, 5/3/05, 2135 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/03 [EM] RE: approval and pareto Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/03 [EM] RE: percentage support Simmons, Forest
• 2005/05/03 [EM] (humor) not the lesser of two evils Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/05/03 Re: [EM] Cardinal Pairwise fails SFC. James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/03 Re: [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval James Green-Armytage
• 2005/05/02 Re: [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval Bart Ingles
• 2005/05/02 [EM] part 2 of Re: approval doesn't meaningfully meet majority or mutual majority MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/05/02 Re: [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/02 Re: [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Russ Paielli
• 2005/05/02 [EM] Preferences and ballots typo MIKE OSSIPOFF

• Earlier messages
• Later messages