>
>It's your unbridled praise of Mac OS 9 as being the epithome of
>stability, that gave you away as a troll, Chip. If you have stable Macs,
>I'm of course glad for you, but that's hardly been the case for a large
>amount of Mac users during the years.
really?
is that why 25% of New mac owners are REFUSING to load/use OSX?
OS9 is so unstable and nonfunctioning that 25% of new owners are
determined to continue to have computers that do not function?
>OS 9 made it a lot better, but I
>suggest you haven't given 10.2 a proper chance and that you haven't
>searched for other peoples experiences enough.
it is really hard to give an application (or OS) a chance when it will
not function for more than 30 minutes at a time. And actually - for the
problems I have had with X I *have* given it more than a 'fair' chance.
Any other program that gave me the problems X is giving me would have
been deleted long ago.
-------------------
Chip Scheide Systems Coordinator
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
"And as a man, who is attached to a prostitute,
is unfitted to choose or judge of a wife, so any
prepossession in favour of a rotten constitution of
government will disable us from discerning a good one."
Thomas Paine - Common Sense, Feb 14 1776
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
