On 3 July 2013 01:03, Charles Steinkuehler <char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
> The main point I am trying to make is the "hackerspace folk" have a > different perspective on the world than the industrial machine control > market where LinuxCNC is typically used, and if you want to engage > these people (which I think is a good idea) the LinuxCNC community > needs to be prepared for the differing perspectives of the two > communities. FWIW I feel that the LinuxCNC developers tend to be closer to the Open-Source movement than to the Industrial Controls market, and this has probably been an obstacle to industrial adoption in the past. (I suspect that it would worry an industrial adopter that he needs to "enthuse" a developer to get a change made, rather than just "pay" him) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
