In message <cb8cb701.1c203%[email protected]>, dated Mon, 19
Mar 2012, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes:
Agree on all accounts except one:
"Envision future airplanes with RF detectors at every seat. If
emissions were detected, a red light next to the isle seat could turn
on."
I don't know who wrote that, because I didn't receive it and Ken didn't
actually leave it appended. It seems worth pursuing.
It isn't the intentional emissions that are a hazard to the aircraft;
it's unintentional, and those are too low-level to register in an rf
detector.
But if they are too low to be detected, how can they interfere with the
aircraft systems? The 'detector' would need to be a scanner, to get
enough signal-to-noise ratio.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
If 'QWERTY' is an English keyboard, what language is 'WYSIWYG' for?
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
