In message <cb8cca2f.1c27e%[email protected]>, dated Mon, 19
Mar 2012, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes:
Broadband rf detectors can see a signal on the order of 1 V/m, which is
good enough to catch an intentional transmission. Unintentional
emissions are controlled to levels between 24-60 dBuV/m, in order to
protect aircraft radios, and those levels cannot be measured with a
cheap and reliable rf detector.
Sure, that's why I wrote:
The 'detector' would need to be a scanner, to get enough signal-to-noise
ratio.
I should think scanners these days are quite reliable and not too
costly. How about 1 per row, rather than 1 per aisle seat?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
If 'QWERTY' is an English keyboard, what language is 'WYSIWYG' for?
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
