"See the less well-known CISPR 17 standard."

Or, any decent text book on a.c. circuits.  The reason I still have some 
of my aging, but still useful, college text books.
_______________________________________________________________________________ 


Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  | 
  Regulatory Compliance Engineering 
 



From:
John Woodgate <[email protected]>
To:
[email protected], 
Date:
07/22/2015 02:47 AM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] GFCI Nuisance Tripping



In message <[email protected]>, 
dated Wed, 22 Jul 2015, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" 
<[email protected]> writes:

>  Filter specifications should not be made in 50 ohm environments but 
>in much lower impedance ranges (0.5 -5 Ohms), so the product will 
>better fulfil the expectations of their users

See the less well-known CISPR 17 standard.
>
>·         Filter manufacturers need to be aware of the existence of 
>emission and immunity regulations and create fully bi-directional 
>filters, for lower input currents (due to lower power consumptions of 
>modern devices)
>
>·         Adequate input/output  filters do not need high value touch 
>current capacitors. By using T-type of filters (LCL) instead of 
>PI-types (CLC) the values of decoupling caps can be heavily reduced (no 
>touch current), at increased cost of dual CM-inductors. But we are used 
>to that aren?t we?

I did a quick simulation of T and Pi filters with 1 ohm impedance and 
normalized frequency, and I can't confirm that the capacitor in the T is 
smaller than those in the Pi. However, the inductors in the T are 
smaller than the one in the Pi.

This seem logical to me, since at cut-off (-3 dB frequency) the T filter 
'matches' zero impedance source and load, and the Pi filter 'matches' 
infinite impedances. So the T filter has a normalized C value of 2, with 
two L values of 1 in parallel, so LC = 2 x 0.5 = 1. The Pi filter has an 
L value 2 in series with two Cs of value 1, so LC is again 1.
>
>·         Shunting a low impedance signal with high value capacitors is 
>NOT the way to go. Attenuation needs a high series impedance followed 
>by a low ground path, I think we all agree about that.  

This is a very important point.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to