On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:33:43 +0200, you wrote:
>As a former owner of this lens, I can say that it's a great lens... I sold mine
>because I didn't use it much after I got a s/h 200/2.8L (1st gen). Now I only have
>three lenses: the 20-35/2.8L, the 50/1.4 (wich could just as well have been an L,
>based on it's wonderfull performance), and the 200/2.8L... I'm hooked on "L"s, but
>there are non-"L" lenses that perform really well too...
By any chance did you ever use this lens (the 300/4L) with a 1.4TC? I
suspect a 2xTC would be asking too much.
This fall I'm considering buying a "bird lens" in the $1500 range, so
obviously I'm considering the 100-400IS, but I'm attracted to the idea
of a fixed focal length lens.
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
