> But at the same time they risk a total-system switch.... Good Point WJ. I guess that's why with the "new" format they had to keep backward compatability (body to lens).
> And in that case, a Minolta with camera-side IS might be more > attractive....;)) For sure: having IS built in to the body sounds a clear advantage (if it works as well). It would make all your old lenses IS too. > Most interesting risk/challenge right now: > Pro's shifting to a 1.6x sensor....in the Mamiya ZX that is, with > 36x48mm sensor. Where did you hear that? Why would anyone want a bigger sensor anyway (rhetorical) ;o) > It's only a tad larger than a 35mm pro-DSLR....:)) > (and not even much more expensive, if the promises are held) Mmm ... you might tempt me away from Canon I'm confused. If Nikanolta between them can't mass produce bigger FF sensors "for technical reasons" - how on earth could Mamiya turn out a 36x48 one without it costing as much as a Ferrari? Something doesn't sound right. B0b * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
