> =============== > G: > I don't know about magic and religion, but science does > not look into "objects", ignoring this naive realism's > term, but observes events and coordinates them in > abstract maps called models. > That deals also with yours below, so I finish here. > > Georges. > ===============
You ignore about the term object. And science yes deals with objects. Because after all that is just matter of the word use Computer Science is "object oriented" And that... believe me, has nothing to do with any naive realism's term. > > > > > > > Finally, although important IMO, Oceans, or the unknow, > > always and in > > all cases ends (all knowledge does) in the space above us. > > We will find ourselves, justifying knowledge, relating to > > outer space > > "above" us. Say Stars for short. > > > This is not metaphysics, I'm pointing a fact.- Ocultar texto entre aspas - > > - Mostrar texto entre aspas -- Ocultar texto entre aspas - > > - Mostrar texto entre aspas - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
