I also am not a expert on this subject, but feel it needs to be addressed. The manufacturers and promoters of the juice box need to address this when selling it. I have worked with SJ in the past regarding their restrictive UL requirements and find them very difficult to work with. Other cities look to SJ for guidance when they have similar problems. Carrying around the charger isn't the answer, and isn't what we should be doing either. There are a lot of UL approved wall mounted charger receptacles on the market that can and are installed in garages that work very well and look nice for the next buyer. I use one that cost me $795.00. Building inspectors have a list of approved devices and don't need to make a big deal out of the inspection. My point is, if it makes everything safer, the responsibility here is the manufacturer. Watch the fallout when SJ finds out this is being done without UL, and yes, SJ means UL not a alternative. Been there and have gone through it with solar.
-- View this message in context: http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-Comparing-JuiceBox-OpenEVSE-and-EVSEUpgrade-tp4664666p4664695.html Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
