Le 25-janv.-07, à 16:48, John Mikes a écrit :

> Bruno,
>  as another chap with learned English "in vertical stance" I 
> "partially" agree with your 'plural' as would all English 
> mother-tongued people, but I also consider the gramatically probably 
> inproper "points of views", since WE allow different 'views' in our 
> considerations. Stathis may choose his preference<G>.
>   "Points of view" assumes THE one view we allow.  "MATTER OF FACTlLY" 
> (plural: 'matters-of factly'? - if it really HAS a plural.  Is there 
> an English "singulare tantum"? ) I still speculate what "point of 
> views" may refer to, however I would volunteer a "point-of-views"  in 
> the conventional sense.
>  Alas, no 'utmost' authority OVER the hundreds of live English 
> versions.

OK thanks. I think I will follow mostly Stathis' suggestion, but you 
just put the finger on why I have a problem. Sometimes I want to talk 
on many first (say) person pointS of view. But sometimes I want to 
speak about all person (first, third, singular, plural) pointS of 
ViewS. So indeed there is a little nuance depending on the number of 
points and views :-)

(Note all this is a bit useless because there are few correlation 
between what I think and write especially when in hurry)

Another solution which I have apparently already used consists in 
saying "hypostase" in the place of person point of view ...



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to