I think the most compelling arguments against a fundamental physical reality go along the lines of starting with one, and showing you can abstract away from it until it becomes just another arbitrary perspective.
-------------------------- - Did you ever hear of "The Seattle Seven"? - Mmm. - That was me... and six other guys. 2008/11/12 Kory Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Nov 11, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > The problem with Dennett is that he takes physical reality for > > granted. > > I agree. But from his perspective, the burden is on us to explain why > we can't take physical reality for granted. I've never seen the > arguments laid out quite clearly enough for my tastes. (And I'll > admit, I've been too lazy to try it myself.) > > -- Kory > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
