Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology

[Flammarion]

On 17 Sep, 00:02, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has it?  I thought we were discussing whether CTM made any meaningful
> commitments as a physical theory, not whether physics can or can't
> include consciousness per se.  Now you raise the question, I don't
> believe it can, simply because in common with virtually every other
> human attempt to characterise the world, its perspective is embedded
> in consciousness and hence can't envision it.

Unless consciousnes is just the very thing that envision itself.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---