From my perspective this debate / clarification is getting lost in language problems.

Given that a universal dovetailer must necessarily produce *all* experiential realities, all possible experiencable moments, how do you account for our endlessly repeated observations of an experiential reality that corresponds *precisely* not only with ordinary every day observations of a physical quantum reality, but also all quantum experiments to date.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to