I will attempt to define the terms in a manner satisfactory to both of
us, and maybe we will understand each other this way.
CTM Computational Theory of Mind is the concept that "the mind literally
is a digital computer ... and that thought literally is a kind of
I understand your steps one to seven to be making this point.
I have no difficulty with this point.
This is what seems straightforward to me.
Thought is a computation. OK.
Experiential reality is a computation. OK.
Chalmers defines a 'Computational Hypothesis'
The Computational Hypothesis says that "physics as we know it is not the
level of reality."
"Just as chemical processes underlie biological processes, and microphysical
processes underlie chemical processes, something underlies microphysical
Underneath the level of quarks, electrons, and photons is a further
level: the level of bits.
These bits are governed by a computational algorithm, which at a higher
level produces the
processes that we think of as fundamental particles, forces, and so on."
This is what you claim to have established around point 7 in your paper.
I do not follow the step from CTM to a Computational Hypothesis. (no,
your last explanation did not help)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at