How do you define the relative point of view?
Do you know Gödel's provability predicate? The points of view are
defined by intensional variants of the current provability predicate
of the machine with or without some oracle. There are 8 basic points
of view p (truth), Bp (provability/believability), Bp & p
(knowability), Bp & Dp (observability), Bp & Dp & p
(sensibility/feelability). Three of them inherits the G/G* splitting,
making a total of 8. It is really 4 + 4*infinity, because the
'material points of view' (with Dp) admits themselves graded variants.
I know *about* Gödel's provability predicate!
(Is the 'intensional' referred to here the 'attach' you used in another
email?)
I am still no clearer about how you define the machine, "with or without
some oracle", and what defines the relative point of view.
Given that you are defining 8 basic points of view in the abstract,
applied to " intensional variants of the current provability predicate
of the machine with or without some oracle", it sounds a bit, well,
abstract. Could you be a bit more specific?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
