On Jul 21, 8:23 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1) if conventional physics gives an adequate causal account,does and > > experience is explained > > with New Physics, does that make experience epiphenomenal? > > In my view, physics, experience, and the underlying relation between > them are all co-phenomenal and co-epiphenomenal
I have no idea what that means. > > 2) What is it about the mathematical structures and functions of your > > New > > Physics that makes it more apt for describing experience than the > > Old Physics? > > Because it recognizes that experience cannot be described in third > person terms How can you have physics that is not describable in 3 terms? How do people write papers about it or devise tests for it. >, and that this fact is not a problem. Rather, the > compulsion to turn it into a problem is explained by the understanding > that we ourselves are inherently biased because we cannot get outside > of the sense of our own collective experience. Instead, we see the > function of privatized phenomenology as a natural feature of, as well > as a function of matter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
