On Aug 6, 2:23 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 8/6/2011 6:30 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > Exactly! It's up to us whether we determine behaviors to be isomorphic
> > enough to our own intelligence to infer that it too experiences
> > similar intelligence. That determination doesn't create intelligence
> > in the object nor remove it. That's why the whole question of whether
> > simulating a brain that seems intelligent to us really is intelligent
> > is a red herring.
> > I have considered that our particular human intelligence may actually
> > be an elaboration-evolution of the intelligence of our immune system,
> > extended to extra-somatic threats.
> And pigs may fly because "fly" may mean to run along the ground.
Why wouldn't the nervous system make sense as an elaboration of the
immune system? Neurons and T-Cells both come from stem cells, directly
or indirectly, right? I don't know enough about it to commit to the
idea, but I don't think that it's at all out of the question as the
basis for hypothesis. It doesn't require that the definition of
intelligence is reinvented.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at