On Aug 30, 5:31 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 8/30/2011 9:41 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > If you deem all phenomena in the
> > universe to be a priori mechanistic, then that word has no meaning. If
> > you want it to mean something then you have to allow that some
> > phenomena are not mechanistic. In that case, if you had to say that
> > something in the cosmos was not mechanical, what might that something
> > be if not human feeling, imagination, creativity and free will?
> A muddle of meaning and value, words and events. Words have meaning, they
> refer to other
> things. The word mechanistic describes certain philosophies or models of the
> namely those in which there is no libertarian free-will. The word is
> meaningful if you
> have theories of the world that do include libertarian free-will; whether
> those worlds
> exist or not.
How could even a fantasy of free-will occur in a universe that was
purely mechanistic? If everything is mechanistic, then mechanistic can
only be a synonym for universality and non-mechanistic becomes
literally and permanently inconceivable.
> A mechanistic world model can still accomodate human (and animal) feeling,
> imagination, creativity and compatibilist free will.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at