On Apr 26, 8:31 pm, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I never said there is no choosing, we choose things all the time. Unlike
> the noise "free will" the word "choose" actually means something; if at a
> particular time I can see that there are 2 actions (X or Y) I can take and
> I don't know which one to do and then at a later time I find that I am
> performing action Y not action X then I have *chosen* to perform action
And if you actualty could have chosen either, you had libertarian FW.
That is what
> > The whole idea of 'picking' clearly, obviously, relies on a third
> > alternative of intentional choice.
> It's completely binary, your "intentional choice" was caused for a reason
> or it was not, if it was then you're a Cuckoo Clock if it wasn't then
> you're a Roulette Wheel; a event happened for a reason or it did not happen
> for a reason, there is no third alternative.
Since "reason" and "cause" are not synonyms there are plenty of
You did it for a reason (aim, goal, end) that was efficiently caused.
You did it for a reason (aim, goal, end) that was not efficiently
You did it because of a cause but for non reason.
You did it randomly and for no reason.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at