Le 23-juil.-12, à 20:30, Stephen P. King a écrit :
On 7/23/2012 6:00 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If this is relevant for UDA, you should show to me. You start from an
assumption of some primitive physical reality.
Could you please explain to me why it is that you make this claim
in spite of repeated explanation that show the contrary?
Because despite you repeat that physics is not primary, you argue that
something is invalid in UDA by mentioning physical interactions, and by
referring to papers which assumes physicalism (implicitly or
explicitly). As I said you contradict yourself.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at