The Dennet conception is made to avoid an agent in the first place because
i so, it whould be legitimate to question what is the agent made of an thus
going trough an infinite regression.

The question of the agent is the vivid intuition for which there are
ingenious evolutionary explanations which i may subscribe. But a robot
would implement such computations and still I deeply doubt about his
internal notion oof self, his quialia etc. The best response to many
questions for the shake of avooiding premature dogmatic closeness is to say
"we don't know"

El 11/08/2012 07:57, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net> escribió:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
>     I have noticed and read your posts. Might you write some remarks
about Leibniz' concept of pre-established harmony?
>
>
>
> On 8/10/2012 8:53 AM, Roger wrote:
>>
>> Hence I follow Leibniz, even though he's difficult and some say
>> contradictory. That agent or soul or self you have is your
>> monad, the only (alhough indirectly) perceiving/acting/feeling
>> agent in all of us, but currently missing in neuroscience and
>> neurophilosophy.
>
>
>
> --
> Onward!
>
> Stephen
>
> "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
> ~ Francis Bacon
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to