On 8/16/2012 8:34 AM, William R. Buckley wrote:

`I used the term **omniscience** in a rather general way, as a substitute for the term
``**universal**
`

`though it should be said that the purpose was to serve as adjective to the term
``**computational**
`

`rather than the other way around, as might be expected when the phrase is given in the
``form of
`

`**computational omniscience**. I like to play with language, and English has a rather
``free form.
`

`Omniscience has a sense of universality to it, and it is not solely connected to deity;
``there is also
`

`notion of realm, and mathematics is such. Hence, omniscience over computation
``(computational
`

`omniscience) represents not so much all knowing as all computable, and remember, all
``that is
`
computable is so computable upon Turing machine as it might be anywhere else.

`The Turing machine, simply by its construction, computes in this universal fashion, and
``no other
`
means of computing provides answers beyond those provided by Turing machine.
Hence, the
Turing machine is not only universally competent as a computer, it also is
computationally
omniscient.

I should think that would be called "computational omnipotence".
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.