On 8/23/2012 1:04 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
The hardest part of the mind/body problem is figuring out exactly what the
An explanation on how consciousness arises in the body.
and what "solving" it is supposed to mean.
Know how consciousness works and how it is related to the physical body.
It's useful to think of what kind of explanation we might find satisfactory. In other
fields, once we have an explanation that fits in with other theories and which allows use
to manipulate or predict things we call it an explanation. When Newton came up with his
theory of gravity he was asked how gravity exerted a force at a distance. He replied
"Hypothesi non fingo." Yet gravity was considered a good explanation of planetary motion,
ballistics, and other phenomena. Eventually, Einstein found a better explanation - one
that agreed with a few more observations and which answered the force-at-a-distance
problem. But it still leaves the question; how does matter warp spacetime? And Einstein
might have given the same answer as Newton. That's why I think that when consciousness is
'explained' it will just be that we will have solved the engineering problems of AI and
robotics to such a degree that everyone will agree that we can make conscious robots and
that we can make them with different personalities and we can manipulated and interconnect
brains in ways that people describe as changing their consciousness, etc. And we will
just stop thinking of consciousness as "the hard problem" because it will be seen as an
ancillary question - like, how does gravity act at a distance.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at